Independent research. Every claim cited.

MOTS-c Peptide: What Mice Showed, What FDA Found, and the Human Trial That Hasn't Happened

The straight answer: MOTS-c is a small peptide made from a gene inside your mitochondria. In mice, it reduced diet-driven weight gain and insulin resistance. FDA reviewed the record in July 2026 and found no published study of MOTS-c given to people, by any route.

Verdict
Not approved in the US and Canada of 4 · Not proven in people

When FDA's reviewers summarized the lab data on MOTS-c for their July 2026 advisory meeting, one finding stood out. Mixed with human blood in a test tube and kept at body temperature, MOTS-c broke down into shorter pieces within 15 to 60 minutes. Nobody has published whether an injection reaches useful levels in a person.

That gap sits under every MOTS-c claim you will read online, from "exercise in a vial" to fat loss.

Also known as: MOTS-c, MOTS c, MOTSc, motsc, MOTS-c acetate, mitochondrial open reading frame of the 12S rRNA type-c

Research use only. This is research information, not medical advice. Nothing here recommends using, dosing, stopping, or combining any product. A licensed clinician decides whether treatment is appropriate.

References: 9 · Published human trials of MOTS-c: 0 · Status as of Oct 28, 2026

Research snapshot

  • 2Studies reviewed
  • 1Human studies
  • 1Registry records

Evidence Facts

Graded for All 5 outcomes

Not proven in people 1/4
Human proofLittle or none
  • 4 of 4 · Strong human proof 0
  • 3 of 4 · Good human proof 0
  • 2 of 4 · Needs more proof 0
  • 1 of 4 · Not proven in people 5

Mostly animal or no reliable evidence. Grades are updated as new studies publish. How we grade evidence

Status by country

Not approved in the US and Canada

United States

Authorization
Not an FDA-approved drug
Prescription
Not part of any approved drug
Compounding
Not on the 503A Bulks List. Nomination withdrawn. FDA staff recommended against listing. PCAC voted 7-5 with 2 abstentions in favor on July 23-24, 2026 (advisory; trade press, FDA minutes not posted). On October 28, 2026 HHS filed a draft enforcement-discretion policy that includes MOTS-c acetate for subcutaneous or intramuscular use, under the conditions on this page. That draft is not a listing

Canada

Authorization
Not authorized by Health Canada
Regulator note
Named in the Health Canada advisory of April 9, 2026, among seized unauthorized injectable peptides

Other countries

Sport, everywhere
WADA S4.4.1 (AMPK activators): prohibited at all times
Coverage
Not recognized by EMA or the European or Japanese pharmacopoeias, per the FDA briefing. Other regulators not reviewed

Full detail and sources are in Status and access by country.

On this page
  1. Short answer
  2. What it is
  3. Why studied
  4. Human studies
  5. Animal studies
  6. By outcome
  7. Mechanism
  8. Safety
  9. Study context
  10. Status
  11. Testing
  12. Compare
  13. Questions
  14. Sources

The short answer

Evidence so far: laboratory and animal studies only. That does not tell us whether it works in people.

Researchers at the University of Southern California described MOTS-c in 2015. In mice on a high-fat diet, it prevented obesity and insulin resistance, acting mainly on skeletal muscle (Lee et al., 2015, PMID 25738459). A 2021 study found that exercise raises MOTS-c levels in people, and that MOTS-c treatment improved physical performance in mice of different ages (Reynolds et al., 2021, PMID 33473109).

Those findings explain the interest. They do not show what MOTS-c does when someone injects it. For how MOTS-c compares with other peptides on evidence, see peptides ranked by evidence. If peptides are new to you, start with what are peptides.

See the evidence by outcome

Compare MOTS-c with another compound

What it is

A woman stretches on a yoga mat beside a bright window.
Photo: Miriam Alonso / Pexels

MOTS-c stands for "mitochondrial open reading frame of the 12S rRNA type-c." Most of your genes sit in the cell nucleus. Mitochondria, the cell's energy plants, carry a small genome of their own. MOTS-c is a 16-amino-acid peptide coded by a short stretch of that mitochondrial DNA (FDA briefing, July 23, 2026).

Researchers group it with other "mitochondrial-derived peptides," such as humanin. It is sold online under the common name MOTS-c, which FDA notes is not an official drug name. FDA says it has seen different salts and derivatives sold under the same name.

Why it is being studied

Two findings drive the interest. First, in mice, MOTS-c acted like a metabolic signal: it worked through AMPK, an energy-sensing enzyme that exercise also switches on (Lee et al., 2015). Second, MOTS-c levels in people rise with exercise (Reynolds et al., 2021).

Put together, those findings led to the "exercise mimetic" label. The label describes a hypothesis. No human study has tested it.

A woman in workout clothes stretches on a sunny country road.
Photo: Andrea Piacquadio / Pexels

What the human studies show

MOTS-c itself: none published. FDA's July 2026 briefing says the nomination "did not include, and FDA has not identified, any publicly available clinical studies or human exposure data" for MOTS-c "via any route of administration." It also found no human pharmacokinetic data, meaning nobody has published how long MOTS-c lasts in a person's body.

Observational data. People's natural MOTS-c levels have been measured. Exercise raised MOTS-c in human muscle and blood (Reynolds et al., 2021). That tells us the body makes more of it during exercise. It does not tell us that adding more from a vial helps.

A related molecule: CB4211. CohBar, a biotech company, tested CB4211, a modified analog of MOTS-c, in a phase 1a/1b trial (NCT03998514). In the 4-week phase 1b part, 20 adults with obesity and fatty liver disease received daily injections of CB4211 or placebo. The company reported in August 2021:

  • ALT, a liver-injury marker, fell 21% with CB4211 versus a 4% rise with placebo.
  • AST fell 28% versus 11%.
  • Glucose fell 6% versus no change.
  • Liver fat fell by a similar amount in both groups.
  • Injection-site reactions were the only side effect in more than 10% of people taking CB4211.

Sources are the CohBar press release, filed with the SEC, and an AASLD 2021 poster. We did not find these results in a peer-reviewed journal, and CB4211 is a different molecule from the MOTS-c sold online.

What laboratory and animal studies show

Most of the research so far comes from laboratory and animal studies. That does not tell us whether it works in people.

  • Metabolism. In mice on a high-fat diet, MOTS-c prevented weight gain and insulin resistance. It also prevented age-related insulin resistance in mice (Lee et al., 2015).
  • Physical performance. MOTS-c-treated mice ran better on performance tests across young, middle and old age groups (Reynolds et al., 2021).
  • Stability. In a lab test cited by FDA, MOTS-c broke into shorter peptides within 15 to 60 minutes in human whole blood at 37°C. It is unclear whether an injection produces active levels over time.

FDA found no published nonclinical toxicity studies of MOTS-c. Safety in animals at the levels people use online has not been characterized in the literature.

Evidence by outcome

One row per compound/formulation x outcome x population x route. No single score is assigned for whether a compound works.
Effect Evidence
Human observational studies 2 outcomes · 1 study
Insulin resistance or blood sugar in people No published human studies of MOTS-c; one 4-week analog study (CB4211), press release only Certainty of 4 · Not proven in people Effect Insulin resistance or blood sugar in people: not assessed Evidence 1 study
Show details Hide details

Applicability

No human studies of MOTS-c. One 4-week analog study (CB4211), press release only, reported glucose 6% lower versus no change. CB4211 is not MOTS-c, and the results are not in a peer-reviewed journal.

Supporting studies

Liver markers 20 adults with obesity and fatty liver disease, analog CB4211 · Daily injection of the analog, not MOTS-c Certainty of 4 · Not proven in people Effect Liver markers: not assessed Evidence 1 study
Show details Hide details

Applicability

CB4211 is a modified analog; results not in a peer-reviewed journal. The company reported ALT and AST fell more than placebo and liver fat was similar. This is not a human trial of MOTS-c.

Supporting studies

Animal and laboratory studies 3 outcomes · 2 studies
Weight or fat loss in people No published human studies of MOTS-c Certainty of 4 · Not proven in people Effect Weight or fat loss in people: not assessed Evidence 1 study
Show details Hide details

Applicability

Mouse studies reported less diet-driven weight gain. FDA found no published human study of MOTS-c by any route, so the human outcome is not assessable.

Supporting studies

Physical performance Mice of different ages Certainty of 4 · Not proven in people Effect Physical performance: not assessed Evidence 1 study
Show details Hide details

Applicability

Favorable in mice (Reynolds et al., 2021). The same paper measured higher natural MOTS-c during exercise in people. That is not a treatment trial.

Supporting studies

Longevity, bone, vascular calcification No human data (FDA)

No animal or laboratory studies identified for this outcome in our reviewed sources.

Certainty of 4 · Not proven in people Effect Longevity, bone, vascular calcification: not assessed Evidence 0 studies
Show details Hide details

Applicability

Nominated uses with no human data (FDA). Not assessable.

Grades are updated as new studies publish. How we grade evidence

How researchers think it works

In mouse muscle, MOTS-c interfered with the folate cycle, which raised levels of a molecule called AICAR. AICAR switches on AMPK, the same energy sensor activated by exercise and by the diabetes drug metformin (Lee et al., 2015). These mechanisms come from cells and mice.

Safety and unanswered questions

What FDA flagged. FDA's July 2026 review said MOTS-c is "not well-characterized" from a chemistry standpoint. Public certificates of analysis lacked data on impurities, clumping (aggregation), bacterial contamination and endotoxin. FDA is "concerned about potential for immunogenicity when administered by an injection," meaning a possible immune reaction to the product.

Reported side effects. USADA says people who report buying MOTS-c online describe a faster heart rate or palpitations, injection-site irritation, insomnia, immune reactions and fever (USADA). Those are user reports, not trial data. FDA found no MOTS-c reports in its adverse event database, and notes that an empty database does not mean a substance is safe.

What has not been measured. We did not find reliable interaction data in the sources reviewed. That does not mean there are no interactions. There is no published data on long-term use, pregnancy, or use alongside GLP-1 drugs such as retatrutide or semaglutide.

Study context

Three things shape how to read this record.

  1. MOTS-c research is young. The first major paper came out in 2015, and most work since has been in cells and rodents.
  2. The one human program, CB4211, was a modified analog. CohBar reported results by press release and poster, and its long-term plan for the drug is unclear.
  3. FDA's experts and its advisory committee disagreed. Details are below.

Status and access by country

Update, October 28, 2026

I read Federal Register document 2026-22192 and the HHS policy PDF it links. HHS filed the notice on October 28, 2026. It publishes on October 30. Comments stay open for two weeks after that date.

MOTS-c is one of six peptides in Appendix A, with BPC-157, TB-500, KPV, Epitalon, and Semax. HHS says it does not intend to take enforcement action against a state-licensed pharmacy, a federal facility, or a licensed physician who compounds one of them, if the conditions are met. One condition is a prescription for a specific patient. Appendix B limits the MOTS-c discretion it describes to the acetate, for subcutaneous or intramuscular use. The product has to contain one active ingredient from that list, so a mix with a GLP-1 drug is outside the policy. The bulk has to come from an FDA-registered facility with a valid certificate of analysis, and the patient label has to say "This is a compounded drug product. Not for resale."

FDA has not approved MOTS-c. The 503A Bulks List is unchanged. The notice calls the policy a draft and says it is not binding. The Secretary wrote that the aim is to discourage research-use-only peptides supplied by foreign manufacturers. NBC News reported the filing the same day. The shared condition list is on Is BPC-157 legal?. Canada is unchanged. The WADA ban is unchanged.

United States. MOTS-c is not an FDA-approved drug and is not part of any approved drug. It was nominated for the list of substances pharmacies may compound, then the nomination was withdrawn. FDA kept evaluating it on its own. FDA staff recommended that MOTS-c not be added to the list.

At the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee meeting on July 23-24, 2026, the committee voted 7-5, with 2 abstentions, in favor of adding it (as reported by trade press; FDA has not posted final minutes we could find). The vote is advisory. As of October 10, 2026, we had found no final rule. The October 28, 2026 HHS filing is a draft decision not to enforce, under the conditions above. It is not that rule. USADA's earlier line, that there was no legal basis to include MOTS-c in a compounded medication during the evaluation, is the record from before this draft.

Canada. MOTS-c is not authorized by Health Canada. Health Canada's April 2026 advisory lists MOTS-C among unauthorized injectable peptide drugs it has seized, and says "For Research Use Only" labels do not make products legal (Health Canada).

Sport, worldwide. MOTS-c is prohibited at all times under section S4.4.1 (AMPK activators) of the World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List, where it is named explicitly (USADA).

Other countries. FDA notes MOTS-c is not recognized by the European Medicines Agency or the European or Japanese pharmacopoeias. We have not reviewed other national regulators.

Testing and documentation

No verification reports have been reviewed for this profile. Straight Up Peptides has not purchased or commissioned testing of any MOTS-c sample. FDA found that publicly posted certificates of analysis for MOTS-c lacked impurity, endotoxin and contamination data. See how we verify claims.

Common questions

What does MOTS-c do?

In mice, MOTS-c acted on muscle metabolism through AMPK, an energy-sensing enzyme, and prevented diet-driven obesity and insulin resistance. What it does when injected in people has not been studied in any published trial.

Does MOTS-c burn fat?

In mice, yes. In people, it has not been tested. FDA found no published human studies of MOTS-c by any route.

Is MOTS-c FDA approved?

No. MOTS-c is not an approved drug. FDA staff recommended against adding it to the 503A Bulks List. An advisory committee voted 7-5 in favor in July 2026. On October 28, 2026 HHS filed a draft enforcement-discretion policy that includes MOTS-c acetate for subcutaneous or intramuscular use when the conditions in the status section are met. The Bulks List is unchanged.

Is MOTS-c legal in Canada?

It is not authorized. Health Canada listed MOTS-C among unauthorized injectable peptide drugs it has seized in its April 2026 advisory.

Is MOTS-c banned in sport?

Yes. It is prohibited at all times under the WADA Prohibited List, section S4.4.1, where it is named.

What are the side effects of MOTS-c?

No clinical trial has measured them. USADA reports user accounts of palpitations, injection-site irritation, insomnia, immune reactions and fever. FDA flagged a possible immune reaction risk from impurities and clumping.

Is MOTS-c the same as NAD+?

No. MOTS-c is a 16-amino-acid peptide. NAD+ is a coenzyme, a small helper molecule in energy metabolism. They are often sold together, and we found no trial that studied them together.

Has anyone studied retatrutide and MOTS-c together?

We found no study of the combination. Retatrutide has phase 3 human trials. MOTS-c has none, so nothing is known about combining them.

Sources, methodology, and changes

Methodology. Literature search on 2026-10-10: PubMed (MOTS-c, MOTSc, mitochondrial-derived peptide, CB4211), ClinicalTrials.gov (MOTS-c, CB4211), the FDA PCAC briefing slides for July 23, 2026, Health Canada advisories, and USADA. Company press releases are labelled as such. Forum posts were used to understand what readers ask, never as evidence of effect.

Primary sources.

  • Lee C et al., 2015, Cell Metabolism: PMID 25738459
  • Reynolds JC et al., 2021, Nature Communications: PMID 33473109
  • FDA, MOTS-c evaluation slides, Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee, July 23, 2026: FDA briefing document
  • CohBar press release, Aug 10, 2021 (SEC Exhibit 99.2): SEC; trial NCT03998514
  • USADA, "What is the MOTS-c peptide?": USADA
  • Health Canada advisory, April 9, 2026: Health Canada
  • PCAC vote tallies: trade press reports (Fierce Pharma, FDA Law Blog), July 2026; final FDA minutes not located

Changes. Oct 10, 2026: first published. Oct 28, 2026: added the HHS draft enforcement-discretion policy, Federal Register document 2026-22192, after reading the public-inspection PDF and the linked policy PDF. The Bulks List entry is unchanged.

Keep reading

Two peptide profiles, cited and graded Open the profiles